🔗 Share this article

Only two days prior to the New York mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of local celebrity this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters leaned toward the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Surprises

How was your night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani led the early vote by 12 points, but came two big batches of votes added later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, it was possible in which yesterday turned out kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. However the winner added 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and residents struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported the former president previously went for Zohran this year. However it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record turnout. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to get over half. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200K ballots uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I believe probable, and I wish he achieves it so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held very white areas, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe occurred a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and residents supported the independent. So there existed some opposition. However no, mostly the leftist base is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

Prior to the vote there was coverage on if Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. However in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance was influential there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters on this one, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

However I think that every city in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Cities are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.